Did A “French” Team Really Win The World Cup?



Debate rages over the role “Africans” played on the French team in the World Cup and on African sportsmen in general and their effect on integration while many in Africa are calling the French win, an African victory.


Bravo Croatia! Your country of just over four million people took on powerhouse France, pop. 65 million, as well as the best Francophone Africa, nearly half the continent, has to offer. This sort of statement sparks anger from the “ethnic French” among anti-racists. Yet, it is the general feeling I find among Africans too.


Screen Shot 2018-07-15 at 23.04.32

Africans celebrate Africaness of French Team on Facebook

Africans took to Twitter and Facebook in the run up to the final, claiming, like journalist Falone Tchounya, with Afrique Media Television, who doesn’t hesitate to write the French victory is thanks to “the Africans” on the team. 


It is interesting to see how many Africans recognize the French team as in fact an African team and support it as such. Twelve of the players hold a second passport from an African country. When they are not selected for the French team, if their country makes it to the World Cup, they will play for the team of their second passport. They will also play for those teams during the Africa Cup of Nations.

The former coach of the Croatian team, Igor Stimac, was severely scolded when he asked who exactly Croatia was playing against in the finals? His Facebook page went viral and drew ire from those who say the “Blackness” or “Africaness” of the French team is a sign of the success of multiculturalism and a symbol of successful integration.

Screen Shot 2018-07-16 at 15.34.57

Let us put aside those thousands in France with migrant background who, following the game, rioted, burned cars and shops, looted and fought police, because they thought it was a vengeance on the country, although born in, they deeply despise. The question is legitimate: who did Croatia play?

Importing Talent

Screen Shot 2018-07-14 at 08.46.03

This Facebook page drew support from Africans & the Ire of Anti-Racists

It is well-known that for the past fifty years, if you excelled in sport, you were fast tracked to a European nationality and passport. Sports open the door to a special kind of immigration. In France, almost all those of North African or Francophone African descent hold a second pass port, anyway.

Africans or those of African descent don’t hesitate to promote the Africans on the French side, feeling a sort of revenge over the European countries which welcomed them or their parents because of what they perceive as domestic hostility.

Karen Attiah, of Ghana and Nigeria descent, wrote in the Washington Post prior to the game : “There is a certain glee that comes with knowing that racists, nativists and anti-immigrant politicians in France have to contend with the fact that the World Cup hopes of Les Bleus rest on the shoulders of black African men.” (Attiah Paper Here)

Yes, many do see France as the last “African team” in the world cup and not just those who feel rejected by the host countries. Professor Khaled A. Beydou, at the University of Detroit, Mercy School of Law, wrote in the ‘Undefeated’ : “Whether nativists, racists and the Marine Le Pens in France like it or not, much of the world views France as the last African team standing in Russia, demonstrating brown and black excellence in all of its glory.”  (Beydou Paper Here)

Rwanda’s Natalie Campbell-Rodrigues writes in ‘The New Times’ ( Click Here) that she is happy to see Africa still represented in the World Cup Final by France but would appreciate an African “African team.” “What would the teams of France, Belgium and England look like if their ‘African’ players were motivated to play for the countries from which they and their families originated?”

Is the French team a French Foreign Legion of mercenary players who will play for another country if they don’t make the cut? “You  can’t say that they’re Africans,” says Frenchman Nicolas K.. “Most of them are born in France.” Does their success in the French team really indicate an advanced state of integration? This does not show when second and third generation French citizens with African migrant background cheer the team of their ancestry with flags in the streets or boo the French national anthem in the stadium if France plays one of those teams. (For two cases of booing click HERE and HERE)

Or can we attribute the phenomenon to a story of Ayn Rand sport: a philosophy of “Objectivism” in which anything that gets you ahead moves society forward too. So, no matter who you play for, it is good for all.

Let us not forget the finances involved in this World Cup Final. Croatia does not have the army of coaches the French can afford; those who teach the French players everything from how to fake a fall and provoke a foul to specializing in shots at the goal.

I guess the question is: Are France’s “Africans” with migrant background truly French only when the national team wins or are the immigrants and their descendents still street-sweepers, nannies and baby-boomers for the foreseeable future?

Whatever the answer, France’s World Cup victory is seen by those in the ‘Dark Continent’ as an African victory too.

And Yes, Bravo Croatia!



  1. “International” players on any team is nothing new Here is a link to the list of English players FIFA recognizes as eligible for English World Cup team play: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_England_international_footballers_born_outside_England
    The best players eligible for the French team happened to be of African heritage and black. So what? Barack Obama, whose father was Kenyan, was president of the United States. Did that make America African? Of course not. Africans on the French team do not make the team African. Of course Africans take pride in the players with African heritage,as any region or culture would. If a preponderance Asians played for Germany, I dare say the German team would have an additional 5 or 6 billion fans.



  2. Another very good article, and very well documented to show that many in Africa see France’s victory as an African victory as well. That’s a view leftists may not want to hear, but it obviously exists…and is quite logical.

    I think both sides are valid: yes, this is an imperialist-fuelled victory, yes these players are “French” and thus is a sort o multi-cultural victory as well. Sports and politics really shouldn’t mix, is my view….



  3. This line about France being an “African team” is hogwash! So Karen Attiah in Washington, some law professor in Detroit, a commentator in a Rwandan newspaper think African males won the World cup for France. Several other African males played in plenty of other European teams. By the way, what about the players from Brazil, Colombia, Coasta Rica, Ecuador? African males too?

    A human, whatever a fascistic Ayn Rand may think about her/him, is a collective, social being. She/he is not another animal with varying genes and looks. Soccer, like other sports, are social activities. One Trevor Noah, now replacing Jon Stewart, on an USamerican TV show is an African helping hold up the US TV scene? The US’ innumerable sportspeople are Africans first? The Willians sisters? The world thinks of them as “Africans”, according to the Detroit law professor? Where and how did the prof get his info about the “world”‘s opinion?

    Those people you’re citing are quoting assorted far-right jingoists in France and presenting their idiocies as general opinion. These kids in the French world cup team — to repeat– were nearly all born in France, all learned to read and write in French schools, all speak French with assorted accents typical of the region they grew up in. All qualified for France’s now recognised as top-notch football academies. Those schools have produced enough high quality footballers to actually put together two French world cup teams.

    Some of the guys have double nationality? So what? That’s allowed under French law, as also under the laws of a host of other countries. What’s the gripe about? Africans are not simply brawn being exploited by something called “France”. Africans are brains too, have always been. Some of those brains were trained in France. Just like journalist Karen Attiah’s capacities were polished up in the US. She’s masquerading as an African migrant or mercenary holding up the Washington Post, is she? Wapo, a pretty reactionary media too.

    Jess Owens was African or American? He ran wearing US colors. He won several gold medals in the Berlin olympics. He said later he was better treated in the streets and bars of Berlin, than in the US, where he and his likes were color-barred. Back home, he was forced to hang up his gold medals and run in dog races to make a living.

    As for the Croatians and their wonderful players, how many sympathise with those sickening nazi ustache trends still pretty potent in their land, especially after it split from united Yugoslavia? Two guys, one player and other a coach, shrieked pro-Ukraine slogans, true not employed by Ukraine’s scary fascists alone, but very often by them. So their small little country put up a team that played well? OK. Places like Portugal, Belgium, Switzerland, those Scandinavian countries all have populations a little higher than Croatia. Still pretty small, most of them. Performed pretty well.

    France’s players are French. Yes, they’re of African origin. Maria Sklodowska was Polish to start with. She developed her mastery of physics and chemistry in France. Marie Curie, as she was later called, won two Nobel prizes!



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.