France’s war on terrorism and collateral damage

The man who got on a Parisian bus with me Wednesday was an Arab who had not shaven in four days. He had dark olive skin and kinky black hair and was visibly unbalanced: drugs? He sang to a popular tune “I’m going on Jihad. Won’t you come on Jihad with me too?” He risks five years in prison and a 75 thousand euro fine.

In the first six days after the massacre at Charlie Hebdo, 54 people were charged with “apology for terrorism” under a tough law voted in the French parliament last November which can jail someone, if they express their “support for terrorism” on the electronic media: FaceBook, Twitter etc., to up to seven years and fine them 100 thousand euros .

France’s “war on terrorism” has begun. The new law allows the “apologists” to be brought before a judge as soon as they are arrested in a process called “comparution immediate”; that is without time to prepare a defense.  It is a law for a time of war.

In Valenciennes, a 34 year-old man under the influence of alcohol who had just had a fender-bender and who, when he was arrested, voiced support for the Jihadi Charlie Hebdo killers, the Kouachi brothers, received a four year sentence.  A 21 year-old man in Nanterre was sentenced to a year in prison for poking fun online at the policeman executed outside Charlie Hebdo, while a 22 year-old in Toulouse got ten months for the same “crime“.  In Nantes, a 14 year-old girl is charged with “apology for Terrorism” and jailed pending trial for threatening to “bring out the kalashnikovs” when controllers asked her for her bus ticket.

The highest profile case is the indictment Wednesday of French comedian and polemicist Dieudonné M’bala M’bala for posting on FaceBook “I feel like Charlie Coulibaly,” after the name of the gunman who killed four people in a Jewish super market and a policewoman in a Paris suburb. Dieudonné’s performances were banned or cancelled by the authorities, under pressure from the government and Jewish lobbies and then, last year, the government simply banned him from the stage altogether. His denunciation of Zionism and what he sees as the over-bearing Jewish influence in French society is often border-line. The last straw was when he commented that when he heard the pro-Israeli Jewish commentator, Patrick Cohen, speak “I tell myself, the gas chambers … too bad.

Teachers in schools throughout France are reporting Muslim students have radicalized their positions since last week, voicing support for the murderers, writing pro-Jihad graffiti and threatening teachers, such as one student who advised an instructor to convert to Islam “for your own good!

The more France fights a “war for freedom of speech”, the more it seems they are jailing and radicalizing Muslim youth for expressing their opinions in favor of “terrorisme”, against the status quo and against the “valeurs de la République.” Grade school children were heard asking “are you for the terrorists or the French.” These pupils are born in France and possess French citizenship. Yet their question shows that, even at the age of seven, they feel foreign in their country.

The Muslim youth in France who suffer from daily discrimination and humiliation don’t see senselessness in the Jihadi violence. The “valeurs de la République” for them is a blocked horizon, unemployment three times the national average, poverty, faceless housing projects and a general sentiment of being excluded from a promised dream.  They find their identity in that gray area that is their exclusion.

It is true that most of the youth who go to Jihad are losers and scum; spineless cowards unable to cope with the difficulties of life, nor able to struggle for their due and of limited intelligence. We are far from the days when trade unions and left leaning parties organized the immigrants and led the battles for their rights.  The days when the labor and social movements actually won some victories.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1789 says “Every citizen has the right to speak, write and print freely.” But the Constitution of the Vème République stipulates “except to respond to abuse of this freedom in the cases determined by the law.

It does not help that the former director of Charlie Hebdo, Philippe Val, is known for his pro-zionist views and his editorial line which concentrates on rediculizing Islam and systematically confusing it with Jihad.  He need not worry about being charged with “inciting to hate“; another French crime of expression.  After all, his insults are “la humour satirique” and thus protected as Freedom of Speech.  Dieudonné, of course, is a “rabid anti-Semite.”  And there can be no humor in that.

The French establishment seems to believe by stifling the “free expression” which goes against “les valeurs de la République,” they will be defending Liberty. And they may be right if you define ‘Liberty’ as right of the ‘haves’ to live comfortably in an unequal society free of any threat from the ‘have nots,’ even  if their revolt is self-defeating, blind violence fueled by oscurantism. This is the real sense of the war France is fighting.

Like all of today’s wars, there is collateral damage. Obviously, the collateral damage in France is the Muslim youth parked in the housing projects known as les cites: a European form of Bantustan.  These laws “for a time of war” are to be used against them. And if the double standards continue on who has Freedom of Expression and who has not, and the violence of the state is used to enforce it, the result will be the same as it is everywhere from Iraq to the West Bank.


  1. Do you have any reference to support the claim that “most of the youth who go to Jihad are […] of limited intelligence”? Because I think it is a gross overgeneralization, as there are many doctors, engineers and so on amon the Jihadi’s.



    1. More than a thousand French nationals have gone to Jihad. They are high school drop outs with police records for the most part, in other words, they get caught. There has not been one report of a college student having gone to Jihad. I have interviewed Islamists with PhDs but they are not your foot soldiers. If you have an example of a college graduate in France who went to Jihad, please share with me. These are ghetto youth who not only lack opportunity but also lack the courage to use the system of fight for their rights.



      1. That’s a statement, not a reference. Do you have a credible source, except your own words?

        I’m sure that among the 900+ French fighting in Syria there are some graduates. As to “foot soldiers” – in any war most of the foot soldiers are not educated. So I don’t see any reason for surprise there.

        The French Muslims have all the opportunities to succeed. Many of them do. Why the ones who fail turn so often to violence – that is the question. Because French Catholics, Jews and atheists who are a loser and a failure don’t tend to kill in name of their faith.



        1. Every single French police report that has been issued and made public on those who have been arrested or reported missing or being looked for. Those are the only sources available. Also my own reporting in the suburbs of France, Egypt, Morocco, Mauritania, Guinea, Mali etc. I think I know what I am talking about.



          1. In other words, its just your opinion. If you know what you are talking about, it shouldn’t have been too difficult to provide a credible, solid research to support your words. Naming to police reports without saying where and when they were published is not very useful. I was genuinely curious about your sources and what you base your opinion on. I sincerely asked you to elaborate, but since you refuse, I am not inclined to take your words seriously any longer.



  2. You say that “Dieudonné’s performances were banned or cancelled by the authorities, under pressure from the government […]”. Are you saying that the “authorities” would have rather seen Dieudonné continue his performances? Who are the “authorities”? Can you please substantiate your claim that the “authorities” had to be “pressured by the government” to cancel the performances. Can you please provide your sources to support this claim?



    1. Sorry so late to respond. The Prime Minister himself called on the authorities to cancel Dieudonné’s performances. The Ministry of Justice took him to the courts. Prime Minister Valls sued him for slander but lost in March. Several ministers (such as the Minister of Culture) and elected officials made public statements calling on Dieudonné’s programs to be cancelled. On March 4th his DVD was banned by the courts.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.